Problems with using taxes as a way of correcting for externalities and market failure The aim of an indirect tax is to make the polluter pay and so internalise the externality. However implementing taxes is problematic: Setting the 'right' tax rate e. IT system of billing Inelastic demand : higher petrol prices via higher indirect taxes has little effect on demand for fuel, likewise, would a tax on sugar get people to cut their consumption of high-sugar products?
Redistribution effects : Indirect taxes are regressive and affect low-income household most. Print page. Geoff Riley. You might also like. Maximum Prices - Revision Update Study notes. Minimum Prices - Revision Update Student videos. Indirect Taxes and Producer Surplus Student videos. Indirect Taxes and Consumer Surplus Student videos.
Subsidies - Revision Update Study notes. Indirect Taxes - Revision Update Study notes. Government Failure: Would a junk food tax cause government failure Student videos. From the Blog. New online sales tax being considered as high street struggles 8th February Government intervention: Could new legislation change UK betting firms for good?
Asymmetric information: Apple pledges to improve transparency on how consumers' data is used by tech industry 28th January Should young people be paid to get vaccinated? Externalities - Turning the Tide on Waste 15th December Social Costs: The high price of salmon farming 15th September Regulating emissions: Should ads for large polluting vehicles be banned? Coronavirus update: Are vaccines public goods?
VAT cut - will firms lower prices for consumers? Competition policy - an investigation into government intervention to promote competition in markets [Year 12] 17th June How to stop plastic getting into the ocean 1st May What is the economic impact of the shutdown of the English football season? Plastic sachets and negative externalities 28th February Why do big government projects cost so much?
Rising obesity as a barrier to development 9th February How serious is the UK about tackling climate change? Unintended consequences: Does a plastic ban harm the environment? US imposes ban on flavoured e-cigarettes 3rd January West Virginia is second, at Georgia has The two states with the highest cost of living also have the highest sin tax rate.
Wyoming and Missouri have the lowest sin tax rates. Although there might be good reasons to impose sin taxes on society, some of these taxes have their downsides as well. Here are the pros and cons of imposing sin taxes. There are three arguments in favor of sin taxes.
It covers some of society's cost of educating people about lung cancer. According to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, national and state opinion polls have "consistently shown broad voter support" for tobacco tax increases. Sin taxes aren't high enough to work. If states really wanted to eliminate the behavior, they would raise the tax until it was high enough to discourage most people from picking up the habit, but not high enough to encourage a black market. Sin taxes aren't high enough to offset the behavior's cost to society.
An example of this type of tax is the carbon tax. Britain imposed a carbon tax, prohibitive enough to force utility companies to switch from fossil fuels to natural gas. As a result, greenhouse gas emissions in the United Kingdom drastically fell to late 19 th century levels. Sin taxes are subjective. Lawmakers decide that some health issues, such as cigarette and alcohol addiction, should be taxed and others shouldn't. Other so-called sins, such as opium and heroin addiction, aren't taxed but are simply declared illegal.
Other addictions, such as sugar, aren't taxed even though they cause health problems such as diabetes. In , Adam Smith wrote that taxes on cigarettes, rum, and sugar are appropriate. The federal government began taxing tobacco during the Civil War. In the s, cigarette taxes became widespread as advertising doubled the number of smokers.
Congressional Budget Office. National Center For Biotechnology Information. Governing the Future of States and Localities. Arizona Daily Sun. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. PMC, U. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Annual Review of Public Health. Accessed April 17,
We will know more in the coming months and will update this page as new relevant information becomes available. Assuming the tax will only apply to gaming then it will only effect those that predominantly play games online, not sports bettors. Players and punters will notice little difference on the face of it at least. The same games will be available and as yet no stake limits or other restrictions have been proposed that will change the nature of how people play games online. What will change is the odds you get and the percentage return to player from within games.
Largely the new tax will be passed on directly to the customer and this will mean you will get less value, i. Fixed-odds games already have lower margins than sports bets, simply because there is less variability to take account of. A sports market is influenced by many human and environmental factors that do not matter when it comes to games.
Therefore even with this new tax a spin of the reels on a slot game is still going to be better value on an individual bet basis than a sports bet. It is easy to change the odds of a slot game by tweaking the software algorithms to ensure less winning lines. It is far more difficult however to reduce the return to player on a table game like roulette, as all of the variables are already fixed. The only way for a site to scrape more from a game like this is to add some sort of ante or to only offer a version of the game that already has higher margins, such as American roulette.
One thing you may notice therefore is some forms of games with very high returns to player becoming rarer or more limited. If the new levy does also apply to sports bets remotely then you may also notice the basic odds starting to get worse as online bookies seek to claw back their lost profits.
Online gambling is one of the most profitable industries there is, there are very low overheads compared to high street bookmakers at least relative to the amount of revenue these guys generate. What you might notice is some betting companies, largely based aboard, may pull out of the UK market.
In reality it will not be the tax alone that drives this but possibly in combination with Brexit it could increase the exodus. There are currently hundreds of licensed brands in the UK to choose from and therefore overall the effect will be minor.
If you are a shareholder in a UK betting company perhaps you will see a drop in price initially, or a reduced dividend, but again this will be short-lived and minor. Gambling sites are exceptionally resourceful and no doubt they will find new ways to attract custom to offset any levy. The online industry is also still growing at a fast rate, meaning the new custom coming on board should also compensate against lost revenue.
The tax could lead to reduced competition in the industry as it will make it harder for smaller companies or new brands setting up. This represents a major saving over other jurisdictions. Related Stories No related photos. Category Exhibitions. Events for February 2nd No Events. Events for February 3rd No Events. Events for February 4th No Events.
Events for February 5th No Events. Events for February 6th No Events. Events for February 7th No Events. Events for February 8th No Events. Events for February 9th No Events. Events for February 10th. Events for February 11th No Events. Events for February 12th No Events. Events for February 13th No Events. Events for February 14th No Events. Events for February 15th No Events.
Events for February 16th No Events. Events for February 17th. Events for February 18th No Events.